Saturday, February 9, 2019

Cramer on Bezos saga: 'If you're selling Amazon off this, you're really stupid'

CNBC's Jim Cramer is warning investors against acting rashly towards Amazon stock, in the wake of Jeff Bezos accusing the National Enquirer's of blackmail over sexual photos texted to his mistress, Lauren Sanchez.

"If you're selling Amazon off this you're really stupid," Cramer said on "Squawk on the Street."

The owner of the Enquirer — David Pecker's American Media, Inc. — released a statement Friday morning denying Bezos' claims. It read in part, "American Media believes fervently that it acted lawfully in the reporting of the story of Mr. Bezos," adding however that its board "should promptly and thoroughly investigate the claims."

In a Thursday blog post headlined, "No thank you, Mr. Pecker," Bezos claims that AMI asked him to publicly deny any political motivation in the Enquirer's coverage of his divorce, in exchange for not publishing photos he texted Sanchez, including a "below the belt selfie."

Bezos and his wife, MacKenzie, announced their divorce on Jan. 9. Later that day, the Enquirer broke news about Bezos' affair with Sanchez.

While shrugging off the alleged Enquirer extortion, Cramer did say it's reasonable for investors to be concerned about how Bezos' divorce might impact Amazon stock, as any separation agreement would make MacKenzie a major shareholder of the e-commerce giant.

"Isn't the issue the dumping of the stock by his soon-to-be ex-wife? The stock is down huge on that," said the "Mad Money" host, whose charitable trust owns Amazon shares. "People are worried she'll blow out of the stock."

However, Cramer countered that argument, saying "focus on the fundamentals" at Amazon.

Bezos, best known for founding Amazon, is still the company's largest shareholder by far, owning 16.3 percent of its shares, according to the company's 2018 proxy statement. Washington state, where Amazon is headquartered and the Bezoses own a home, is a "community property" state, meaning if the couple files for divorce there, all assets and debts accrued during their marriage will be considered owned by both husband and wife.

— CNBC's Lauren Feiner contributed to this report.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter Morning Squawk CNBC's before the bell news roundup SIGN UP NOW Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about about our products and services.
By signing up for newsletters, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. .investigation-wrapper .description{ text-align:center; padding-bottom:15px; } .nl-privacy{ font-size: 10px; padding-top: 20px; display:block; } .wildcard .investigation-wrapper { -webkit-box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px 0px #999999; /* Android 2.3+, iOS 4.0.2-4.2, Safari 3-4 */ box-shadow: 5px 5px 5px 0px #999989; } .subsection .investigation{ background: #efefef; border-radius: 3px; padding: 10px 20px 20px 20px; } .investigation small{white-space:normal;} .subsection .investigation h1{ text-transform: uppercase; text-align: center; font-family: "Proxima Nova Semi Bold"; margin-bottom: 0px; padding-bottom:0px; font-size: 18px; margin-top: 10px; word-spacing: 1.5px; color: #333333; } .subsection .investigation .headline_title { font-size: 28px; padding-top: 20px; display: block; font-family: "Proxima Nova Bold"; padding-bottom:5px; } .subsection .email-info { background: rgba(74, 144, 226, 1); max-width: 140px; margin: 0px auto; text-align: center; padding: 6px 1px; color: #fff; border-radius: 5px; } .subsection .email-info { color:#fff; } .subsection .email-info:hover{ background: #2077B6; } body .subsection.investigation-wrapper{overflow:visible;}

Friday, February 8, 2019

Net 1 UEPS Technologies Inc (UEPS) Q2 2019 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Net 1 UEPS Technologies Inc  (NASDAQ:UEPS)Q2 2019 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 08, 2019, 8:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Net1's Second Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference. All participants are currently in listen only mode and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions later during the conference. (Operator Instructions) Please note that this call is being recorded.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Dhruv Chopra. Please go ahead, sir.

Dhruv Chopra -- Head of Investor Relations

Thank you, Chris. Welcome to our second quarter 2019 earnings call. With me on the call today is our CEO; Herman Kotze, and our CFO; Alex Smith. Our press release and a supplementary financial presentation are available on our Investor Relations website ir.net1.com. As a reminder, during this call we will be making forward-looking statements and I ask you to look at the cautionary language contained in our press release regarding the risks and uncertainties associated with forward-looking statements.

In addition, during this call we will be using certain non-GAAP financial measures and we have provided a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. We will discuss our results in South African rand, which is a non-GAAP measure. We analyze our results of operations in our press release in rand to assist investors in understanding the underlying trends of our business. As you know, the company's results can be significantly affected by currency fluctuations between the US dollar and the South African rand. We will have a question-and-answer session following our prepared remarks.

So with that let me turn the call over to Herman.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Thank you, Dhruv, and good day to everybody else. As you are all aware, this was a very difficult quarter for our company and the transition out of our SASSA contract has been more challenging than anticipated given the auto-migration of our EPE account holders. Alex, will go over our financial results in detail shortly, but our operating loss for the quarter was predominantly attributable to our rural South African businesses. Our remaining transaction related businesses continue to operate in-line with our expectations and provide a substantial source of EBITDA to the group. The annualized EBITDA contribution of these businesses based on Q2 2019 results was approximately $56 million. Furthermore, we have net cash of $35 million and remain comfortable with the group's liquidity position over the next 12 months. Our immediate focus is to return our EPE-related businesses to a monthly break-even level by the end of the fourth quarter in turn being both EBITDA and cash flow positive as a result.

Going forward, the four pillars of Net1 will be more geographic focused and business units focused and we expect it will greatly reduce the complexity in analyzing our business. The four pillars will be (A) South Africa, (B) Africa, (C) Europe and Asia, and (D) Korea. I will spend some time discussing each of these shortly. But before I address these pillars, I would like to briefly discuss my thoughts on current valuation as I know this is top of mind. We believe that the issues we are facing are contained and manageable. We know where we need to quickly cut costs, we know how to do it and we're confident that these changes will not impact the long-term viability of our strategic advantages or market opportunity.

I want to reiterate that the company remains financially sound with sufficient liquidity, and as I mentioned, our other transaction processing business ex-rural South Africa currently generate annualized EBITDA of $56 million with the individual growth characteristics intact. When adding our investment portfolio conservatively valued on our balance sheet at approximately $270 million, plus our new initiatives in Europe and Africa, you have a very robust, profitable company with far more, certainly in my opinion, than the current stock price suggests. I would like to add that the management team and our Board of Directors, all own stock at much higher prices and we're committed to seeing the value of our businesses properly recognized.

Let me now address the first of our four pillars namely, South Africa, starting with EPE and its related financial and value-added services businesses, as we disclosed last week, the High Court of South Africa recently unexpectedly reversed the portion of its November interim ruling that would have required SASSA to reinstate over 1.5 million EPE accounts that were auto-migrated to South African Post Office or SAPO accounts. This hit back and other headwinds, coupled with the interrelated nature of our consumer financial services, had a significant bearing on our rural South African business segment in the second quarter. This rural South African segment includes EPE consumer bank accounts, Moneyline micro-lending services, Smart Life micro-insurance and our mobile ATM network and its roots stem from the infrastructure we have built out over the last 20 years to deliver services to this constituency.

As recently as the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, this rural segment had been consistently profitable as we were approaching 3 million EPE accounts with many of those individuals also buying insurance and taking up loans validating the strategy and value proposition we banked (ph) upon three and half and years ago. And importantly, we were quite confident that we could grow the business meaningfully from those levels. Our infrastructure, technology and experience of providing the most affordable financial services for the underbanked low income rural demographic in South Africa is second to none and we believe would carry out through the transition. Unfortunately, we got it wrong for the sole reason that we have not been allowed to compete on a level playing field. We believed that we could rely on our contractual agreements with our EPE customers particularly as this was confirmed by the High Court's interim order in November.

The aggressive tactics employed by SASSA and SAPO over the last six months without regard to commercial practices or rights and benefits of grant recipients came as a surprise and have resulted in significant operating losses and write-offs for the company not to mention the management bandwidth required to deal with the situation rather than focusing on our newer business opportunities. We're still pursuing legal options at our disposal, as we believe our EPE customers fulfilled all the regulatory requirements at the time of opening their accounts. At this junction, we are evaluating all options with regards to this business, but our immediate focus is to ensure that we right size our South African operations and get into a monthly breakeven level in Q4 2019. We have already commenced with an extensive cost reduction exercise but given our local labor laws, it will take two to three months before they can become fully effective. We have also dramatically scaled back the distribution footprint and mobile ATM fleet to focus only on high-volume areas at this time.

Once the business is right-sized, we can always look to increase capacity again based on the amount at that time without having to incur any significant capital expenditure. We believe we're currently running at a stable base of EPE customers, which have been consistent at these levels for December, January and February. There is a risk that our remaining base could also be auto-migrated and if we do see further deterioration in this business, we are willing to sell, lose (ph) or close this entire operation. It would be sad for us and devastating for our employees and the people of South Africa living in these rural communities, but given SAPO's actions, we would have no other option.

Having said that, we're actively engaging with SASSA to ensure that the million plus Annexure C forms that were presented by every single EPE account holder opening an account from January 1, 2018, onwards is processed in-line with the High Court order and those customers can continue to enjoy the benefits of their voluntary election. In addition to all of this, we need to focus our efforts on immediate changes to the business and will adapt if necessary in the future. We will proactively provide updates to any changes in the regulatory, legal, operational or strategic developments related to these businesses.

Regarding Moneyline and Smart Life, both of these products form a key part of the attractiveness of our EPE offering, namely access to the cheapest credit and insurance. We took an allowance on our doubtful finance loans receivable of approximately $23 million toward all the EPE customers whose accounts had not been funded until December 2018. The remaining book relates to all those customers who are current with their repayments in February 2019. Smart Life continues to be profitable even at a lower base. Our transaction processing and bill payment platform EasyPay continued to post double-digit top line growth during Q2 2019.

The UEPS/EMV certification for Finbond is now complete and we are in a position to permit issuing cards next month. As with all other creditors exposed to the social grant recipients, Finbond has also experienced challenges in the recovery of loans from this market segment and has taken remedial measures to address this part of its business. As we work closely with Finbond on our go-to-market strategy, each business has a number of complementary assets and we are evaluating the best way to maximize the synergies. DNI continues to grow ahead of budget despite the particularly challenging consumer spending environment and has begun to expand its offerings. It is also in the process of working with Smart Life to create new micro-insurance products for its in-market (ph) users. Cell C's operating performance continues to be in-line with the performance of its peer group in South Africa. They have concluded the implementation of their tower sharing arrangement with MTN, and now have a much larger geographic footprint in the country to address customers that were previously unable to service. While there have been market concerns about their competitive position and short-term liquidity, we believe they have the mechanisms in place to manage their liquidity. An update on the operating performance will be provided between (ph) Cell C and Blue Label reports at the end of February 2019.

Now let me address our second pillar, which is Africa. As a group, we want to meaningfully increase our focus on using our technology to address the financial inclusion opportunities on the continent, depending on the country 10% to 30% of the adult populations have access to financial services, and that's the deployment of cloud-based card and mobile-based solutions together with strong local partners presents a substantial opportunity for us. Today, we are operational in Namibia and Botswana. We have foothold in nine other countries through our VTU offering in partnership with MTN. We have UEPS as the national payment system in Ghana, a rapidly growing consumer finance operation in Nigeria through OneFi, and our brand new QR based payment initiatives with V2 and Zapper Group Africa, which in a few short months is already live in beta with one of the largest banks in Ghana and in advance discussions with one of the largest mobile operators in West Africa.

We expect V2 to play an integral role in the deployment of our technology across Africa as its management team has an extensive network spanning across banks and telcos in Africa. There are clear synergies in having a single business development channel to promote our range of mobile and card based payment technologies for the unbanked markets and we are currently in the process of creating the appropriate structures, business models and prioritization of countries and hope to be able to provide a clearer roadmap on our next earnings call.

OneFi in Nigeria has grown its revenue over 300% over the past year and in this calendar 2018 in the black. Its management team expects to more than double revenue again in 2019. As one of the first neo-banks and digital lenders in Africa, OneFi's core app called Paylater continues to gain traction with over a million downloads and a remarkable customer conversion rate. They have also expanded into payments and soon expect to launch card based products. OneFi also recently became the first digital lender in Africa to obtain a double B credit rating.

The third pillar is Europe and Asia driven primarily through IPG or the International Payments Group. IPG continues to work in close collaboration with Bank Frick and our other specialist departments to develop bespoke blockchain based solutions including a highly secure but easily accessible crypto asset storage solution for crypto asset investors and exchanges for which we have filed two patents during Q2. We are on track to have a live prototype in Q4. During the last 12 months, we have been focused on creating a world-class end-to-end solution to service the specific needs of underserviced SME merchants in Europe. These merchants require seamless and fast onboarding bank accounts, payment gateway services and often the ability to issue cards to the customers. While our IT development teams have been creating the required solutions, which have now been certified by the required organizations, we have established our core operational center in Malta and exited our various offices in high-cost jurisdictions. We believe that IPG together with Bank Frick is finally in a position to be a challenger bank for the SME market in Europe. In India, MobiKwik continues its successful transition from being a mobile wallet only provider to a full digital financial services provider. They currently issue more than a thousand micro-loans a day through the app, which is able to approve and disburse an application in an industry-leading 90 seconds. In addition, during Q2 MobiKwik has also launched its micro-insurance and micro-investment products, allowing Indians to invest in mutual funds for as little as INR100 or approximately $1.50.

Our fourth pillar is Korea, or KSNET made specifically. Operationally, KSNET put up another solid quarter and we continue to see improvements in that unit. During Q2 2019 revenue declined a modest 3% in local currency, primarily due to a shift toward higher margin direct sales from lower margin agent sales and as a result, EBITDA margins increased to 22% from 20% in Q2 2018. As we discussed last quarter, we appointed an external advisor to assist with the acceleration of top line growth and improving profitability as well as to evaluate our strategic alternatives for this business. We have made good progress over the past couple of months and our advisors are actively engaged both with KSNET management and head office. While its card VAN business was primarily impacted by the regulatory fix over the past couple of years, KSNETs banking VAN payment gateway and working capital finance offerings are growing at significantly better rates and are accretive to overall margin. We continue to believe that we are on track to return EBITDA to a $40 million run rate in fiscal 2020. KSNET is a fabulous business with a great management team who have proven their worth by expertly navigating some very difficult regulatory headwinds over the last several years. It is also a very unique business as there is only one other international payment processing company that operates in Korea. While we have stated several times in the past that Korea is not strategic to the rest of our business, it has been a great free cash flow generator and does fit nicely in our core transaction processing portfolio.

To conclude, before I hand over to Alex, I want to comment on our investment portfolio, which I believe warrants meaningful attention by our current and potential shareholders. Taken together, these investments well exceed our total market debt despite no contribution to our overall EBITDA and minimal contribution to our fundamental earnings per share results. We continue to see great value in our own shares and have approximately $76 million remaining on our existing share repurchase program. We remain restricted from using our current cash surplus and South African cash flows until we pay down our outstanding loans of approximately $35 million in full and we have to reserve some of our foreign cash reserves for working capital purposes. Once our loans are repaid by June or we find liquidity elsewhere, we expect to be in a position to consider opportunistically resuming our share repurchase program.

Net1 is transitioning through the most complex period in its history and despite our setback with the latest SASSA ruling, we believe we have a great foundation to return to being a high growth company. We want to assure our shareholders that management and our Board of Directors are highly committed to limiting any future losses and are focused on growing our other profitable businesses while launching several new and exciting ones. We are pleased with the performance of KSNET, DNI and our EasyPay financial switch and other transaction processing businesses in South Africa. We are considering all options with regard to the South African business and our near-term focus is to ensure that we resize these operations and get them to a breakeven level by Q4 2019.

Alex will now go over the financial performance and metrics in more detail before opening it up for Q&A.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Thank you Herman, and good day to everybody. I will discuss the key results and trends within our operating segments for the second quarter of 2019 compared to a year ago. Turning to our results for Q2 of 2019, our average rand/dollar exchange rate was ZAR14.32 compared to ZAR13.67 a year ago, which adversely impacted our US dollar based results by approximately 5%. The rand has strengthened slightly since quarter end and is currently trading around ZAR13.60 to the dollar. Revenue of $97 million in Q2 2019 was down 35% year-over-year in dollars and down 31% in constant currency. Our fundamental earnings per share declined to a loss of $0.88 impacted predominantly by the losses incurred by our South African financial inclusion business as a result of the forced migration of SASSA grant recipients from EPE cards to SAPO cards. Fundamental EPS includes a $0.74 per share of non-cash adjustments, including a $0.41 allowance for doubtful loans receivable, a $0.28 Cell C fair value loss adjustment and a $0.05 Cedar Cell note impairment loss.

By segment, South African transaction processing reported revenue of $22 million in Q2 2019 down 66% compared with Q2 2018 on a constant currency basis. The decrease was primarily due to the termination of the SASSA contract and to a lesser extent to the migration from EPE as mentioned above. Our revenue and operating income was also adversely impacted by the significant reduction in the number of SASSA grant recipients with SASSA-branded Grindrod cards linked to Grindrod bank accounts as the contract ended at the end of Q1 2019, as well as the lower EPE numbers. These decreases in revenue and operating income were partially offset by higher transaction revenue as a result of increased usage of our ATMs as well as higher volumes in EasyPay. Our operating margin for Q2 2019 and 2018 was negative 53.8% and 21% respectively. We have so far been unable to recover any additional fees in respect of the extension period of the SASSA CPS contract. We have engaged directly with SASSA to try and reach agreement on the pricing and this is ongoing. We have no visibility of the timelines to resolving this matter despite the pricing recommendations of National Treasury which were around 3X the original contract rate.

International transaction processing generated revenue of $38.1 million in Q2 2019, which was down 14% compared with Q2 2018, primarily due to a contraction in IPG transactions processed, specifically meaningfully lower crypto exchange and China processing and modestly lower KSNET revenue. The segment generated an operating loss of $4 million in Q2 2019, which includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of $7 million. Excluding this impairment operating income during Q2 2019 was higher than in Q2 2018 due to the improved contribution from KSNET. Q2 2018 included an allowance for doubtful working capital finance receivables of $7.8 million. Normalizing for both these items, operating margin of 7.8% in Q2 2019 was stronger than the 6.4% margin in Q2 2018 and was sequentially stronger than the 7% recorded in Q1. KSNET has largely contributed to this margin improvement. For Q2 2019, KSNETs revenue decreased 3% in Korean won to $35.4 million, while EBITDA margin increased 22% compared to 20% in Q2 2018. We experienced modest revenue pressures due to a change in mix in the business to higher margin in direct sales from lower margin agent sales and operating income and margin continued to show improvement compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The last of the cuts under the previous regulatory intervention on an interchange pricing came through in October 2017.

Further rate adjustments are expected from February 2019, but the impact is not expected to be as significant as the previous adjustments and we are taking actions to mitigate these effects. KSNETs cash conversion remains good and we have accessed approximately $12 million from Korea during the last quarter and a further $18 million in January 2019. IPG had another very challenging quarter as transaction volumes remain low and they are pushed to conclude their restructuring processes in Q2 2019. The impairment loss recognized relates primarily to goodwill within IPG, given the consolidation and restructuring of IPG over the past year, several business lines were terminated meaningfully reduced and so we've written off the associated goodwill despite our confidence in the long-term prospects of IPG. With the restructuring process is largely complete, the focus has shifted to growing volumes as well as the launch of the various new products discussed previously. As a result, we expect to see performance steadily improve over the remainder of the fiscal year will be at a slower pace than previously communicated.

Our financial inclusion and applied technologies segment includes DNI from July 1, 2018, and reported revenue of $38.8 million in Q2 2019 down 25% on a constant currency basis. Segment revenue decreased primarily due to fewer prepaid airtime and value-added service sales, lower lending and insurance revenue, and a decrease in inter-segment revenue, partially offset by the inclusion of DNI. Operating margin was minus 47.8% compared to 23.5% in Q2 2018. Our gross lending book has been adversely impacted by SASSA's migration of EPE accounts, which effectively prevents us from collecting loan repayments as no direct debits can be run against the SAPO bank accounts. In Q2 2019, we created an allowance of $23.4 million, approximately ZAR335 million to compensate for the non-recoverability of debtors. We have effectively provided for all loans when no repayments have been received since December and consistently maintained a conservative allowance against the remaining book. With the stability we've seen in the EPE account base since December, collections post the quarter end have stabilized and we would expect this to continue provided there is no further reduction in the customer base.

We've seen the similar impact on Smart Life from the impact of the SASSA transition where Smart Life customers moved to SAPO account. We are unable to collect a direct debit against that account. We have initiated various new collection mechanisms to deal with these issues and have experienced increasing though limited success to date. As a result of the SASSA migration, we have seen policy numbers drop from around 480,000 at its peak to 400,000 at the end of December, but based on uncollected premiums this is expected to drop to around 200,000 in the next quarter as the policies only lapse after four months. With the expected reduction in claims, the reduction in provisioning levels, we expect Smart Life to remain profitable but at a much reduced levels with these policy numbers. In the December pay cycle, just under 1.1 million of our EPE customers received an incoming deposit into their accounts compared to 1.3 million in October, and these numbers remain stable in the January and February 2019 payment cycles. Our ability to sign up new EPE accounts during this period was limited due to the actions of SASSA as despite opening up new accounts, only about 40% of them have received a grant to date.

Our corporate expenses have increased primarily due to higher acquired intangible asset amortization, we carry our investment in Cell C at fair value and fluctuations in its carrying value from reporting period to reporting period are expected. During Q2 2019 we recorded a non-cash fair value adjustment of $16 million, which adversely impacted our results. Our valuation methodology has remained unchanged and the decline in fair value is solely attributable to a decline in the market multiples of the peer group of eight African and emerging market mobile telecoms operators. We also had to impair the carrying value of the Cedar Cell in the notes in-line with this reduction in fair value. Our Q2 2019 net interest expense was $3.1 million compared to net interest income of $2.4 million in the comparative quarter; however, this included the impact of a $2.7 million impairment of the Cedar Cellular notes which affected interest income. Excluding this effect, net interest expense was $0.4 million. This change was due to the cash utilized for strategic investments in fiscal 2018 and interest expense increased due to the South African lending facilities we obtained particularly in respect to the funding of our ATMs. We recognized losses from equity accounted investments of $1.3 million during Q2 2019 compared to earnings of $1.3 million in the same period last year. The reduction from the comparative period is primarily due to the fact that DNI did not contribute to equity income in Q2 2019 as the business has been consolidated effective July 1, 2018. We expect the contribution from our equity accounted investments to be positive on an annual basis as it is impacted by the timing of reported results by our various investments.

At December 31, 2018, our unrestricted cash was approximately $70 million compared to $90 million at the end of June. The decrease in our cash balances from June 30, 2018, was primarily due to significantly weaker trading activities, scheduled debt repayments, dividend payments to non-controlling interests and capital expenditures, which was partially offset by the utilization of our debt facilities to fund our ATMs and finance our lending to Cell C to fund the construction of mobile telephony network infrastructure, the contribution from the inclusion of DNI, and a decrease in our South African lending book. Free cash flow utilization amounted to $7.8 million which included a $7 million working capital release. Apart from our lending arrangements, we continue to fund the group's operations utilizing our cash reserves. We have in place short-term credit facilities of ZAR1.75 billion or $121 million specifically to fund our ATMs in South Africa and have presented cash drawn under these facilities and in the processing system as restricted cash on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2018, we had restricted cash of $63 million and an associated short-term facilities utilization of $63 million. We had short-term banking facilities available to us in various territories of $31 million at December 31, 2018, none of which have been utilized. As of December 31, 2018, we had outstanding long-term debt of ZAR380 million or $26 million under our South African facilities. We expect to make two further principal repayments of ZAR151 million during the remainder of fiscal 2019, three equal repayments totaling ZAR79 million during fiscal 2020 and the remainder of our debt will be settled in full in June 2021.

Our Q2 2019 tax benefit was $2.3 million compared to an expense of $10.1 million in Q2 2018. Our effective tax rate for Q2 2019 has been significantly impacted by impairments and the losses incurred by certain South African businesses as we have effectively not recorded a deferred tax asset benefit related to these net operating losses. Our effective tax rate will continue to be heavily distorted by losses incurred by certain of our businesses until we return the affected operations to at least a breakeven position. Our actual and weighted average share count for each of December 31, 2018, and Q2 2019 was 56.8 million shares. In light of the losses in the South African EPE related operations, we've initiated a cost reduction exercise, which would take these operations to a monthly breakeven position by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. The key components in the cost base that need to be reduced are headcount, security and related infrastructure costs. Respecting local labor law, we will only see the full benefits of the cost cutting on a monthly basis in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. Once we achieve breakeven on the South African operations, it should return the group to a positive EBITDA and cash flow position.

We can now open up the call for Q&A.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you very much sir. (Operator Instructions). Our first question is from Allen (inaudible) from Maxim Group. Please go ahead.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Good morning. So my first question is if you could help us simplify the analysis of what your earnings or losses would have been if you excluded the challenged South African businesses and how much of losses from the, say, financial inclusion business kind of, and you think about, what -- you mentioned that you could have a positive operating margin in that business, maybe starting next year, but what type of margin are we talking about? Thank you.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Allen, I think in terms of the impact of the South African rural and financial inclusion businesses on the results are round about $37 million of the operating loss came out of that segment -- or out of those business units in the quarter. So you can see a very substantial portion of the losses really coming from those businesses and that's really the -- our Moneyline business or Smart Life business, and the mobile ATM infrastructure and the various cost bases related to it.

We think that for the third quarter, our overall sort of group EBITDA number should be in the region of a loss of about $5 million based on a normal, on the current run rate and the current customer base, particularly in EPE space, and that would obviously exclude any once off items which will occur in the third quarter as we go through the various cost-cutting exercises.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Thank you. And then another kind of bigger picture question, you have a significant value in your investments and KSNET in my view, but the market is not giving you credit for them and it seems that management will need to take actions to unlock this value in order to you to likely get credit . So my question is, how does the management think about this?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Allen, there are obviously various assets within the portfolio and they are of different sizes and in different geographies. The way we look at them is individually. We understand that some of these individual portfolio assets have a longer path to liquidity potentially than others. And so we evaluate and look at each of these on an ongoing basis. And so, I think it's important to stress that clearly KSNET is by far the largest contributor to the group earnings and not necessarily part of the investment portfolio. But I think a lot of our shoulders look at KSNET as a better than outsider in terms of the overall group structure. And as I've said, it fits very nicely into our transaction processing portfolio, but we are busy with an ongoing exercise and were appropriate we do bring in expertise and help from the relevant management advisors and banks to help us understand what the potential opportunities are out there for the businesses. So it's an ongoing process and something that we are very aware of and obviously we will keep our shareholders updated as to any developments as and when they happen.

Operator

Thank you, sir. The next question is from Scott Buck from B.Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Hi guys. I'm curious, are you continuing to issue new loans within the micro-lending book?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Hi, Scott, yes, we are. So there is a different methodology that we actually adopted in as far ago as February last year, so on a very selective basis, we provide loans to people that have obviously got EPE accounts, those accounts need to be active for at least a minimum period of three months and we obviously do a comprehensive affordability assessment on them. The extent of just to give you an idea of the application versus actual disbursement ratio is that we reject more than 60% of all the applications that we receive. And I think the indication of the quality of the book that remains is such that the first strike collection rate on the booking for the month of February was in excess of 98%. So, short answer, yes.

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay, that's helpful. And then, I know, you had some trouble growing EPE accounts organically this quarter, what's the thought process going forward on what the marketing efforts are going to be to try to continue to grow some of those account numbers organically?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Yes, so the account numbers have been fairly static over the last three months and we have registered some nominal growth in the uptake rate. The big plan for the next three to six months is to focus on the distribution channel that we have now unlocked through our relationship with Finbond. So over the last quarter, we have also been able to obtain the required certifications for Finbond to become an issuer of our UEPS EMB cards and so with that behind us, we now have access to Finbond's 450 odd branches, in addition to our own 250 odd branches, we have approximately, sort of 670-680 odd locations across South Africa to really market the EPE offering. We hope to add additional products to this offering, specifically in the field of low-cost telephony and data access, which we believe is still an important consideration for our customer base, but there will be a lot of focus and effort not only obviously from ourselves, but also in collaboration with Finbond to grow this customer base going forward.

Operator

Thank you, sir. The next question is from Joshua Raizin of Cedar Street Asset Management. Please go ahead.

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management LLC -- Analyst

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Given the changes to bring the EPE base back to breakeven, give a clear idea how many current EPE customers fall outside of what will be the new geographical operating area? Thank you.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

None. So we were still able to service all of the current EPE customer base, the right-sizing that we are doing is of such a nature that we are not willing to (ph) at all closing down specific geographies. It is a factor of right-sizing the individual teams within each of those areas, but making sure that we retain a core team that is capable of servicing those EPE card holders. Our fixed ATM base obviously remains in place. So, there are over 1,100 of those. We hope to grow that quite significantly over the next 12 months by another 500 or so. It is really only on the mobile ATM base which is by far the most expensive of all of our distribution channels that we are scaling back, but again where the volume warrants, the actual deployment of those ATMs, we will continue to service the card orders in that area.

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management LLC -- Analyst

Great, thank you.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our next question is a follow-up from Allen. Please go ahead.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Yes, hi. The financial inclusion segment looks like if you excluded the doubtful finance account allowances, you'd have around a 12.5% operating margin, the segment had been running at around 20% to 25-ish percent or so, is this 12.5% kind of the right number to think about going forward?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

I think the 12.5% is certainly at the bottom end of where we would expect to be Allen, you know the financial inclusion segment is highly sensitive to the addition of other goods and services and products into the customer base. And so, given the amount of containment exercises that's been going on over the last three months or so, we haven't really focused on expanding the product base, but as that gathers momentum, we would expect the margin in the financial inclusion business to start recovering back toward the sort of 20% region.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Okay. And then a follow up, explain a little more KSNETs revenue decline and that you've been running around an $8 million quarterly EBITDA for KSNET. So what -- I'd like to understand what makes you confident that next fiscal year you can get to that $10 million run rate to get it to a $40 million annualized EBITDA, what -- I know you have a third party working, but what's going to, what do you think is the actions that's going to increase that?

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

There are a few of them, in order of importance, the work that we're doing at the moment really focuses across all the key product areas of the business. So if we look at the first one, which is the card VAN or the proper sort of card processing business and that by far is obviously the biggest contributor to KSNETs financial results. The key focus for us in that specific segment is two-fold.

First, we are specifically focusing on diversifying our merchant portfolio to not be completely focused on the SME market in South Korea but to include some of the more sort of medium and larger sized merchants within that specific portfolio, those merchants although the sales cycle is slightly longer, have a slightly more profitable contribution to the overall EBITDA result.

The second element that we are focusing on really revolves around the difference between the agent based distribution model that we follow quite extensively in South Korea and a direct sales-based model. And so, obviously with the use of agents, there is the introduction of an intermediary party that introduces all sorts of different cost and complications. And so we are in the process of carefully analyzing all of those individual relationships to make sure that we focus on the profitable ones and that we reduce our exposure to the regions or the agents who are less profitable for the business.

The second area of product that we are focusing on is our banking VAN products. I think this is by far our most profitable offering in the South Korean market and we are the only VAN company that actually offered this as a service, I think the barriers to entry are pretty high and so we are focusing on aggressively marketing that product into the larger sort of Korean space.

And finally, we have a working capital finance business which was conceived about 2.5 years ago and we are very careful and conservative, initial testing and prototyping, we are now finally in a position where we can offer this as an additional products to all of our merchants, specifically the SME merchants. Again, these will be loans that are very relatively small in size but are absolutely critical for these businesses to grow their own activities and obviously as the process we have full visibility of what those businesses actually do in terms of revenue and throughput and we obviously have very good security against those advances. And so the combination of those three with obviously a few other things that are not as important, we hope to get back to the sort of $40 million EBITDA rate in 2020.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you very much. Next question is from Tom Zeifang of Lucrum.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Good morning, guys. Could you help me understand what the recurring revenue and recurring operating profits are by business unit using Q2 19 as your base?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

The recurring revenues in terms of the individual segments that we report?

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Yes, so, if you back out the melee that you guys had in the second quarter knowing that that's going to go away. Can you give me those, what you are recurring, what you consider recurring revenues and EBITDA? So, we can get a sense of what the current business is worth and also if you could do that on a -- from the investment portfolio what that generates relative to your share of those percentages?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

I can cover it by segment as opposed to by business units. Our total sort of revenue run rate of the recurring businesses and really here we're talking about sort of five business units, so we've sort of identified DNI, the KSNET and some of the South African processing businesses excluding the troubled businesses, then there's about $56 million of recurring EBITDA sitting within that space and annual revenue of about $300 million. Does that make sense?

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

That's recurring.

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Yes.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yes, and we obviously have to right-size and fix the troubled areas in order for that to be evident in the results.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

And is -- on the $56 million annualized, KSNET is part of that, correct?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yes, a very substantial portion of that, yes.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

So, it is $32 million of the $56 million?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yes, approximately.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

And so when you make these adjustments going forward, what do you think the exit rate for June will be?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

For June, difficult to say given we are -- the cost cutting exercise is obviously a big one and we expect to be break even on a monthly basis by the end of Q4, but there will obviously be recurring -- there will have been losses during that fourth quarter and there's likely to be a lot of once-off costs in both Q3 and Q4 associated with the cost reduction process.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

My final question, how much we're losing on a monthly basis right there?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

On those South African businesses?

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Correct.

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

I mentioned earlier that for the quarter -- for Q2 we saw about $37 million losses in those South African businesses, that obviously includes some of the -- obviously includes the $23.4 million of [inaudible 1:02:44], but really Q3 on the basis of what we see now and assuming there is no further significant events, from a group perspective, we'd expect to see EBITDA losses of about $5 million for the third quarter.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

For the quarter, not for each month?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

No, for the quarter. That's on a group wide basis.

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

Okay, thank you.

Operator

Thank you. We have a follow-up of question from Allen, please go ahead.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Yes, hi, for the South African transaction business, how do you visualize going into next fiscal year, if you do right-size, is this the business that you think you can get a margin on it and if so, what type of margin would that be?

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Yes, I think definitely this is -- the remainder of the South African transaction processing business includes some of the other perennially good performance, including the EasyPay bill payment and transaction processing switch. The biggest factor when we look at the margins and what this business will contribute going forward Allen, is that the CPS has got the traditional rural South African mobile banking base will be gone going into fiscal 2020. It obviously has been depressing our margins for quite some time as the volumes -- the payment volumes in those specific -- for those specific channels came down. By the end of this year we would have eliminated all of the high costs associated with running that part of the business so that would include staff, security and cash handling costs, and so entering the new year, I think the business will be profitable as it has been if you stripped out those specific costs over the last year or so, and again, we would like to see the overall margin of that business recover over the course of next year to the sort of levels that we had in 2017 and 2016.

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Thank you very much.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen that then concludes this conference call. You may now disconnect your lines.

Duration: 55 minutes

Call participants:

Dhruv Chopra -- Head of Investor Relations

Herman G. Kotze -- Chief Executive Officer and Director

Alexander M. R. Smith -- Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

Allen Klee -- Maxim Group -- Analyst

Scott Buck -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Joshua Raizin -- Cedar Street Asset Management LLC -- Analyst

Thomas M. Zeifang -- Lucrum Capital, LLC -- Analyst

More UEPS analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Thursday, February 7, 2019

The Unique Relationship Between the Defense Industry and the U.S. Government

The defense business is unique in its reliance on one massive customer: the Pentagon. The Motley Fool's Nick Sciple and Fool.com Contributor Lou Whiteman discuss the pros and cons of that relationship, including the risk to the industry from infighting in Washington and the impact of the recent shutdown, on this segment of Industry Focus: Energy.

A full transcript follows the video.

This video was recorded on Jan. 31, 2019.

Nick Sciple: First, Lou, before we dive too deep into that, I want you to talk about, how significant is the government as a customer for these defense contractors? How important is what's going on in Washington D.C. to their bottom line?

Lou Whiteman: This is the trade-off of this industry. The good news is, you have a customer who, so far, for 200 years in, has been able to pay its bills, and it's pretty reliable on that. However, you are reliant on that one customer, and increasingly in recent years, there has been erratic behavior with that customer. In this case, the Pentagon was not shut down, which certainly helps these defense contractors, but they do a lot more than just serve the Pentagon. They do a lot of the IT work for different agencies that were shut down. They do a lot of work for NASA and Homeland Security, who were involved in the shutdown. So, yeah, this adds a huge layer of uncertainty to a business that is, as you say, very reliant on that one customer.

Sciple: Just to give you some numbers on the shutdown, obviously it was the longest one in history at 35 days, and we're still not 100% sure whether it's over for good. We've got this continuing resolution in place that's going to keep the government temporarily open until Feb. 15, but there could be another shoe to drop. Definitely some uncertainty for these defense contractors.

One way that these defense companies were impacted during the shutdown was the ability to follow through on some foreign arms sales that had been taking place recently because the Department of State and Department of Commerce were both shut down. Can you talk about the effects of that on some of the defense contractors in the U.S.?

Whiteman: Sure. As you say, for all these foreign sales, there's a few different programs that we do foreign sales. Some through the State Department, and some just need approval from Commerce. But they do need to be rubber-stamped. Sometimes, it can be controversial.

International sales are a big push of this administration, and it's expected to grow. It was over $55 billion last year. They're hoping for more this year. This is a significant chunk of revenue that did shut down. The good news is, it was early in the quarter. We're mostly talking about the first quarter of 2019. There's a lot of time to play catch-up. The State Department officials really believe that it won't mess up the year. It could have a small effect in the first quarter of 2019, but hopefully, they're back at work. Most of what was in the pipeline was pretty non-controversial, so it should be a matter of just getting it out the door. But that's certainly a huge risk, more for the first quarter of 2019, but a huge risk for these companies and their numbers.

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

4 Expenses That Can Eat Into Your Retirement Savings

The challenging part of retirement is adjusting to the idea of living on a fixed income. Many seniors, in fact, experience loads of stress over the notion of depleting their nest eggs prematurely. The better you plan for what retirement will cost you, however, the less likely you'll be to struggle financially during it. Here are a few big expenses that are likely to eat into your savings, so be sure to prepare for them appropriately.

1. Healthcare

Healthcare is some seniors' greatest expense. Even if you kick off your golden years in a relatively healthy state, you never know what medical issues might arise as you age. And Medicare often falls short in covering seniors to the extent they need it.

A senior couple sits at a table reviewing paperwork.

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

To avoid finding yourself cash-strapped later in life, expect healthcare to cost a bundle and save for it. HealthView Services, a cost-projection healthcare software provider, estimates that the average 65-year-old man today will spend $189,687 on healthcare in retirement, while the average 65-year-old woman will spend $214,565. That's a lot of money.

There are steps you can take, however, to lower some of your medical costs. First, consider a Medicare Advantage plan. An alternative to traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage is an all-in-one health and drug plan, and it typically offers a wider range of coverage than original Medicare will give you. Another option is to look into supplemental insurance to make up for traditional Medicare's coverage gaps.

Being smart about your prescriptions can also help you keep your healthcare costs in check. Using generic drugs when possible can make your copays more manageable, as can ordering medications in bulk. And don't discount the possibility of snagging free samples -- medical offices get them all the time, and if you're not shy about asking, you can shave some money off your total costs that way.

2. Housing

Many seniors are surprised at what they end up spending on housing, especially since a large percentage enter retirement mortgage-free. But even if you do manage to shake that monthly mortgage payment in time for retirement, don't forget that as homes age, they tend to require more upkeep and repairs. And the older you get, the less physically capable you might be of performing that work yourself, thereby leading to an uptick in maintenance costs.

Another thing: Property taxes have a tendency to rise over time, even during periods when home values decline. Furthermore, all it takes is for your home to get assessed at a much higher value than previously determined, and bam -- your property tax bill could skyrocket.

Be prepared for the costs of homeownership in retirement, and save for them so you're not left in the lurch. Or consider renting, especially if you haven't yet paid off your mortgage.

3. Transportation

Many seniors assume that their transportation costs will drop drastically once they stop working. After all, not having to commute to work should save you a bundle, right?

Wrong. If you own a car, the bulk of the expense associated with it most likely isn't fuel costs, but rather the cost of insurance, maintenance, and repairs. In fact, AAA estimates that it costs $8,849 a year, on average, to own a vehicle, which is a pretty high number when your income is limited.

A better bet, therefore, might be to try to avoid owning a car in retirement. Granted, that may not be possible if you live in a suburban or rural area, but if you're in or near a city, relying on public transportation could save you quite a bit of money. Otherwise, try unloading one vehicle if you're currently a two-car household. That'll save you a bunch of cash, too.

4. Entertainment

The funny thing about work is that it's a relatively inexpensive activity. And when you stop having a job to go to, you might suddenly find that you're spending a small fortune to keep yourself occupied.

Even if you're not planning to travel extensively during retirement, all of those museum visits, theater tickets, and lunches with friends at local cafes could quickly add up. And while there are senior discounts out there that might minimize the damage, you should still make sure to budget for leisure in retirement. At the same time, make an effort to seek out free or low-cost entertainment to keep your spending in check. Many museums, for example, offer free admission days, and with a fairly flexible schedule, taking advantage should be feasible.

Even if you save efficiently for retirement, you might find that your senior living expenses are higher than planned. Prepare for these four in particular to avoid get caught off-guard later in life.

Sunday, February 3, 2019

How Domino's Crushed It In 2018

It sells an easily replicated product that's not substantially different from the cheesy meals cooked by any of the thousands of privately owned pizza shops that span the country. And yet Domino's (NYSE:DPZ) extended its impressive business rally last year by soaking up market share and generating solid profit growth for its shareholders.

Investors rewarded the stock by sending it 31% higher following 2017's double-digit performance. Here's why.

Steady Growth
Domino's started the year with mixed results. Its fiscal fourth quarter showed significant growth at existing restaurants both in the U.S. and internationally. However, that expansion pace slowed on both counts even though it outpaced rivals like Yum! Brands' Pizza Hut. There was more good news than bad in the year's first report, including rising profitability and a quickly growing global store count.

The pizza chain hit the accelerator over the following months. When every restaurant chain in the wider industry seemed to push into the home delivery niche, Domino's demonstrated over the next few quarters why it remains the leader in that arena. Sales gains jumped in the first quarter to mark its 28th consecutive quarter of positive results in the U.S. The international business sped up, too.

Domino's then introduced technical advances to go along with its usual menu upgrades and limited-time offerings. Its "hotspots" program added 200,000 non-traditional delivery locations (like parks and beaches) to its footprint to help extend the positive sales momentum into the second quarter. The chain wrapped up the calendar year with healthy third-quarter growth in just about every market that left rivals like Papa John's far behind.

An Enduring Competitive Advantage?
All the positive sales growth supports management's plan to add thousands of new Domino's locations to their global footprint over the next few years. The chain opened 140 delivery hubs in the U.S. market over the first three quarters to make it one of the fastest growing franchises in the country. There could be room for many more locations, executives argue, as the chain attacks the huge take-out niche.

Domino's has wider ambitions away from home, where its small store square footage gives it flexibility to go up against established restaurant rivals while stressing price, food quality, and convenience.

When judging a potential investment in the Wall Street darling, investors have to weight those benefits against key risks, including high debt or the potential that Domino's competition will catch up to it, either with respect to food quality or the speed and ease of delivery offerings. The latter point is a concern given that deep-pocketed peers, including McDonald's and Starbucks, are pouring resources into that arena right now.

For the year ahead, shareholders might see Domino's sacrifice profitability so that it can defend its recent market share and technological wins. A persistent growth slowdown at existing stores, meanwhile, would likely stop the stock's rally in its tracks.

On the other hand, as long as Domino's can keep finding ways to boost market share, just as it has for over a decade now, then the outlook is bright for this delivery-focused pizza specialist. Whether it's through international expansion or a push into carry-out for mature markets like the U.S., the chain has no shortage of opportunities to extend its brand into new niches.

This article originally appeared on The Motley Fool.